Template:Did you know nominations/John Knox (British Army officer)

 The following is an archived discussion of John Knox (British Army officer)'s DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 18:29, 31 March 2013 (UTC).

John Knox (British Army officer)

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that John Knox's journals provide one of the most complete accounts of the British Army's campaigns in North America from 1757 to 1760?

• Reviewed: Exempt (3rd nomination only) but have reviewed Mass No. 6 (Schubert)

Created by Ykraps (talk). Self nominated at 01:06, 25 March 2013 (UTC).

• Comment Is it "most complete" or "one of the most complete"? The article and the hook say different things. ~ Riana ⁂ 03:47, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

• Snow's book says "most". He repeats this claim on page 268. My less definite phrasing is due to my own natural caution, I think. I have changed the hook to agree with the article; unless you think I should change the article to match the hook? Regards--Ykraps (talk) 08:22, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

• I personally think the more cautious phrasing is better, barring any other sources that cite it definitely as the "most" complete. :) It still makes a catchy hook in its current form, I think. In all other matters, I think this one is good to go. ~ Riana ⁂ 12:05, 25 March 2013 (UTC)