Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primal Athletes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 05:21, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Primal Athletes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Neologism, violates WP:NFT. There are no reliable sources for this term. Addition of a redlinked athlete smacks of an attempt at an end run around WP:ATHLETE. Also looks like advertising. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 22:42, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, unsourced neologism and yes, advertising just make a delete a certainty Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 11:23, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:37, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unsourced and reads like nonsense. Ebonyskye (talk) 00:41, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.