Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Drinkwater
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Della Falls. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 07:21, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- Joe Drinkwater (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Completely unsourced biography of a person notable only as a local prospector and explorer, with no reliable source coverage to make him extralocally notable for either endeavour. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 02:31, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect to Della Falls. Drinkwater gets some brief shout outs in British Columbia place name books such as British Columbia Place Names and Hiking Vancouver Island. As the current article is unsourced, there's nothing to be merged to the target where he is briefly mentioned already. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 15:11, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect -- perhaps to Della Falls, provided this is verifiable. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:30, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:43, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:43, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect as mentioned, not confidently acceptable for independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 04:58, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.